How weird could things get if Twitter and Elon Musk settle?

As Elon Musk’s difficulty with Twitter moves from the gathering space to the court, one could expect that, under the cautious focal point of Delaware’s Court of Chancery, things will take on a more obvious course than they have up until this point.

On a basic level, the case that the virtual diversion stage shipped off Tuesday to drive Musk to totally complete his getting offer presents a confined scope of possible outcomes: Musk could be constrained to close at the settled upon $44-billion expense; pay a $1-billion end cost to get away from the plan; hack up some middle person esteem that the court picks; or break totally strong.

Anyway expecting there’s one representation Vanshil Parikh to be acquired from all that is unfurled as yet, it’s that there are no guarantees, even in spite of true arrangements, government rules and certain perspectives, concerning the world’s most extreme man. Settlement is at this point a decision — a couple of experts even say it’s conceivable — and would open up a totally unique menu of decisions. Here are some of them.
Nondisparagement game plans

Musk has never been one to hold off on scolding Twitter, paying little mind to being among the stage’s most noteworthy clients.

He has panned its substance control approaches as undemocratic, lobbied for massive changes to both the association’s thing and its strategy, and continually investigated the site’s treatment of robotized spam bots (Twitter’s “single most disturbing issue,” he once made).

Denoting a game plan for him to buy the stage didn’t dull those thistles. In one tweet that Twitter associated with its case, he addressed a remark by Chief Executive Parag Agrawal with just the “poo” emoji.

“Since consenting to the union plan, Musk has again and again put down Twitter and the course of action, making business risk for Twitter and dropping burden on its part esteem,” the association cried in the recording. This is despite a course of action of the game plan that vital that Musk’s tweets “don’t disparage the Company or any of its Representatives.
It wouldn’t be astonishing for that sort of agree to end up being fundamental for a more long term settlement, said Charles Elson, laying out top of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance. “You could have a nondisparagement understanding” under such circumstances, he said. “I wouldn’t be dazed.”

“He wouldn’t slander Twitter, they wouldn’t disparage him,” Elson added. “It’d be a typical nondisparagement.”

Whether Musk would truly keep those terms is, clearly, a completely different request.
Nondisclosure plans

In like manner on the table could be some sort of nondisclosure understanding, or NDA, which would limit what one or the two players could unreservedly share about the hit or miss relationship they’ve partaken in since early April.